Joey Dauben Gets 'Snapped'

I dont really care who anyone is on here, but for a long while I have been pretty sure that Joey has been posting on this site and now I have my smoking gun. The latest from is a poster by the name BA Bararcus. This poster has also posted things on topix on the exact same day Joey put out other propaganda on there. This BA guy claims over and over to be an unbiased observer who doesnt even know Joey or Presley. But, they made a mistake, and put their email as the same exact one as a previous poster named beverly thompson. Oopps, and now that the two IP addresses are the exact same, we can put together what this mystery person has said on here (all along saying they dont know Joey or Presley). So lets look at these post as they happened:

Thompson 305 Beverly
asperum@gmail.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/06/22 at 10:09 am
It is abhorrent when people make false accusations about sexual misconduct. When the only thing they have is just their “word” and no proof or non prejudiced witnesses. Especially when they wait years to complain about it. These types are repugnant. I think we all agree on this point.

unless of course we don’t like the accused person and then we will take whatever is said as the truth because we have decided that the accused is a truly repugnant individual and then who cares if there is only the word of someone years later with no witnesses or other proof Amen to that !!!!!! Tommy


Dustin Thompson
asperum@gmail.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/06/22 at 1:31 pm | In reply to gingersnapthornoftruth.
That’s hilarious I don’t even know these people. It’s funny how even in your response you can’t acknowledge the missing insight as to why you are doing this, I fully believe based upon the information your sight has that Shane has been wrongly or emotionally accused of things Although the case is strange and the Judges are strange it’s a classic exaggeration case because in real sex abuse cases there are witnesses and texts and etc. the funny thing is that you due to blinders cant see it in your stuff regarding Joey, that’s just hilarious

And just for Info FYI purposes Shane lost today Skyler remains with whats her name I truly cant remember her name right now and not even gonna scroll up to look it up


Dustin Thompson
asperum@gmail.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/06/22 at 4:35 pm
I had to wait till you were done and you left no tampons or pads, Heavy flow for you today? Now read slow I Will interpret this into stupid for you so you can understand in your fluent language:

That’s hilarious I don’t even know these people.( Funny….. No know these people)

It’s funny how even in your response you can’t acknowledge the missing insight as to why you are doing this, (You no know how come you do this)

I fully believe based upon the information your sight has that Shane has been wrongly or emotionally accused of things (Me think Shane not do it…)

Although the case is strange and the Judges are strange ( It strange case)

it’s a classic exaggeration case because in real sex abuse cases there are witnesses (They tell tall tales people see when you diddle little boys)

and texts and etc.(Phone hmmmm…… Text…. Records..)

the funny thing is that you due to blinders cant see it in your stuff regarding Joey, that’s just hilarious (Ha Ha You hate Joey he guilty…. Shane not do it You like)

And just for Info FYI purposes Shane lost today (Shane lose today hearing)

Skyler remains with whats her name I truly cant remember her name right now and not even gonna scroll up to look it up (little girl stay with mommy what her name? I no remember)

Now you speak stupid so I wrote in stupid. Did you understand or did AC unit fall on head today?


Dustin Thompson
asperum@gmail.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/06/22 at 5:25 pm
Oh good you are bilingual! Shane tried to hold mommy in contempt and have emergency Temporary Orders removing Skyler from Mommy. Mommy’s name is Sue, I just remembered. Shane will probably try again but if he really had something it would have worked today, but you never know


Dustin and Beverly Thompson
Thompson@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/02 at 6:03 pm
Question Daddy-O How do you know the results of Presley’s famil law case so quickly? And Honey why you email her so much?


Dustin and Beverly Thompson
Thompson@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/03 at 4:40 pm
Some of your points are valid, by not abidingby a ruling they undermine a pillar of our society. If its wrong then appeal it or get facts to prove it. As I said before very few pedophiles escape detection forever and it seems thast Shane may not be as advertised by her mom. it would be interesting to know how the Crowe family buscame so unglued. If Mommy is deranged generally speaking, not always, Daddy helped push the wheelchair over the cliff. but only you can give us insight on that since youand Shane are buddies.

i did hear two things
1.) Mommy did not give Skyler up as ordered
2.) Joeys ridiculous Patrick Wilson crime is set for October for Trial.

See you at the BBQ Daddy-O


Beverly Thompson
BeverlyThompson@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/05 at 2:33 pm
Hip shooters bother me too So read before your weep what your sow. Joey was appointed a Court appointed attorney in the Fraudulent use of identity info case in February of this year after signing an affidavit in which he attested to being INDIGENT. The 40th District Court and the Ellis County Clown office received the affidavit. Hearing was had and joey was determined to be INDIGENT and an attorney from the indigency appointment list was appointed to him. Thereafter the Clown office tried to and succeeded in seizing the ECO. Joey filed a similar indigency affidavit in the 10th Court the appeals Court . The 10th Court referred it back to the 40th.for hearing. The Ellis County Clown show now contests this indigency affidavit. which comes after the 40th and the DA have already seen heard and ruled upon his claim of indigency. Now you see Lucy…. and Karl you are right you are really not that amusing more sad than amusing


Beverly Thompson
BeverlyThompson@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/05 at 3:42 pm
all your info was obtained in the Farris lawsuit from the source go back to your little rock and I do not even know Joey so LOL keep trying


Beverly Thompson
BeverlyThompson@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/05 at 5:03 pm
Im not saying what your name is, all your info real false and other was provided by service providers all your info


Beverly Thompson
Judyedger@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/05 at 5:10 pm
I did say Farris all you morons that follow this stuff leave me laughing too much MVZ lawsuit

Judy Edger
Judyedger@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/07/06 at 10:02 am | In reply to gingersnapthornoftruth.
I just think its funny just like you and its an update for your fixation. Why do you talk about Presley it has nothing to do with Joey except as a tangent. IDK any Team Joey except in your mind

babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/01 at 1:27 pm
Its always fun to watch the legal eagles tell everyone how the system works.
An Attorney can issue a subpoena in a Civil case or a party can have one issued for 20 dollars no Judge required
Per ginger’s comment he or she was served with a subpoena “What was subpoenaed from me ”
The subpoena has the name of the person from whom information is sought thus identifying the person.
yes it is a little more difficult to get the type of info discussed but Google and yahoo have agree to provide this info for the most part due to the number of idiots that run stupid blogs

IP addresses are fairly traceable and the actual service provider ATT etc will have the info on who pays which is just another subpoena away

So if someone really wants to know who you are its not that hard. Apparently all the Thompsons were connected to gingersnap on the ECO

Not saying who you are or aren’t ,” I’m just sayin”


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/01 at 1:41 pm
I went ahead and read the skank article. This is the problem with the internet anyone with two fingers can posit on any subject and generally that is their sum total of expertise, The article mentions that each attempt would require a new lawsuit…not true maybe a hearing for the judge to decide what gets obtained but its still the same lawsuit.

And although Google did not just comply with the subpoena they didn’t fight. In effect they objected and said we will do whatever the Judge says we have to do it was the blogger who fought the subpoena…probably doesnt matter but be careful what you rely upon on the internet Just like anyone who read the ECO be careful what you believe or this too


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/01 at 3:00 pm
Not sure what intimidation tactics you are talking about Quite frankly you all are harmless idiots who fixate on another of your ilk ohhhh damm you are infectious….

Subpoenas require no “probable cause” in civil cases. It is the right of the ISP to contest it “move to quash” but they do that merely to discourage the practice and really have no dog in the fight as its not their identity that is being sought nor their “information”

I never said it was quick it would take about 3 to 6 months.

Actually law enforcement has to get a judge to sign off on it and have probable cause so it actually is harder for them because they are only supposed to do it for interests of “Justice” In a civil case you have two private individuals with a bone to pick with each other and it really has less of a hurdle because its really not private info. Think about it you are “publishing” online. If it was private you would keep it private.

So adjust your tin foil hat and realize I do not give a shit who the idiot that is gingersnaptornoftruth is but If someone wants to find out they can it does cost money, which you should save yours…damm you guys are infectious


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/01 at 3:02 pm
what case are you talking about MVZ which you guys said was a default judgment or Skank?


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/01 at 3:12 pm | In reply to gingersnapthornoftruth.
so you were a doe okay. And you weren’t asked for your info just some posters from here? Apparently some of the comments that were posted under gingersnap on ECO were by the thompson twins family end of mystery.

If the IP is there then if someone wanted to spend the money it would be relatively easy as in time consuming and cost money to hunt you down as you apparently pay for your internet connection.
I’m just saying. I would not waste a penny on figuring out who you are


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/09 at 1:01 pm | In reply to nothingbettertodotoday.
It helps if you actually read the code. “In lieu of the selection of prospective jurors by means
of a jury commission, the district judge may direct that 20 to 125
prospective grand jurors be selected and summoned, with return on
summons, in the same manner as for the selection and summons of
panels for the trial of civil cases in the district courts. The
judge shall try the qualifications for and excuses from service as a
grand juror and impanel the completed grand jury in the same manner
as provided for grand jurors selected by a jury commission.”

This is what happens in ellis and then the they are picked without any questioning by the Defendants because……… they are not defendants until indicted… people like you are amazing with opinions and more opinions So now you have something better to do today learn how to read .


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/08/15 at 5:07 pm
news release got a copy from a friend


babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/09/04 at 5:32 pm
I’m not on Topixs oh and i have tried to intelligently debate and its a brick wall here.

I'm not on Topixs oh and i have tried to intelligently debate and its a brick wall here.
localattorney@yahoo.com
babaracus
1
ApproveUnapprove | Reply | Quick Edit | Edit | History | Spam | Trash Joey Dauben and Me through the Years
40 View Post
Select comment babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/09/04 at 5:30 pm | In reply to babaracus.
Why don’t we go back to the real point you posted published things that were false. Or go back to an even older issue why are you hiding and being deceptive about who you are?. And really are you serious do I need to go find your fourth grade anticis they are here too

Why don't we go back to the real point you posted published things that were false. Or go back to an even older issue why are you hiding and being deceptive about who you are?. And really are you serious do I need to go find your fourth grade anticis they are here too
localattorney@yahoo.com
babaracus
1
ApproveUnapprove | Reply | Quick Edit | Edit | History | Spam | Trash Joey Dauben and Me through the Years
40 View Post
Select comment babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/09/04 at 4:25 pm
OMG!!!

OMG!!!
localattorney@yahoo.com
babaracus
1
ApproveUnapprove | Reply | Quick Edit | Edit | History | Spam | Trash Joey Dauben and Me through the Years
40 View Post
Select comment babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/09/04 at 4:24 pm | In reply to nothingbettertodotoday.
As usual you did speak and anytime that happens it is too soon. And as usual you are wrong I did not twist any truth, in fact it was GS that was caught lying and manipulating the facts who then said things like maybe I misquoted the fictional Chief of Police. Who is mad ? There is nothing to be mad about oh yeah It was speculated about who GS might be based upon documents requested from her and of course we have to believe its not true,,,, now you speculate that I’m Joey based upon what … oh that someone takes the other side … which again I’m not even doing I provide some long rambling manifestos and knew some Court dates that I give to GS….seriously? And although you might be a moron I was not even reading your hapless comments as most times well a two year old i more amusing. Oh you got Snapped!!! Are you guys really serious?

As usual you did speak and anytime that happens it is too soon. And as usual you are wrong I did not twist any truth, in fact it was GS that was caught lying and manipulating the facts who then said things like maybe I misquoted the fictional Chief of Police. Who is mad ? There is nothing to be mad about oh yeah It was speculated about who GS might be based upon documents requested from her and of course we have to believe its not true,,,, now you speculate that I'm Joey based upon what ... oh that someone takes the other side ... which again I'm not even doing I provide some long rambling manifestos and knew some Court dates that I give to GS....seriously? And although you might be a moron I was not even reading your hapless comments as most times well a two year old i more amusing. Oh you got Snapped!!! Are you guys really serious?
localattorney@yahoo.com
babaracus
1
ApproveUnapprove | Reply | Quick Edit | Edit | History | Spam | Trash Joey Dauben and Me through the Years
40 View Post
Select comment babaracus
localattorney@yahoo.com
108.249.176.146 Submitted on 2012/09/04 at 3:55 pm | In reply to yappy.
That is so funny, I’m not in the least trying to get you, you are way to slippery and sleazy to get. You continuously go back and forth on your illogical statements which is what makes you amusing and sad. I will be here long after Joey goes away or does not go away. I haven’t supported any of Joey’s positions. Hate Wilson? he is a joke… I have never met Presley and saying that I think she should be off limits is you getting under my skin, … That’s what makes this mildly amusing You people make no sense. I did get some of Joey’s stuff from a friend and guess what I gave it to you without comment. Knowing some of the legal end I knew of some of his Court dates It’s public record … Wow the difference between Publishing and printing that’s your big argument about intelligence. Fine I used print instead of publishing and you are publishing all of this your lies your truths your inane belief that no one can identify you, i post here because you people are amusing like a two year old is amusing and … well that’s it you are stupidly amusing. Yes said print but you do not even know that you publish so what does that make you. ummmmm stupid oops I hurt your little feelings again by calling you a name oh so sorry. and by the way there are only like five followers of your inane comments.