Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Something New in the 3rd Edition

In Joey's latest manifesto, there is one interesting part where he talks about who and how it was that he made bond. Its tucked away inside a very long, stupid, and convoluted story about Tamara Yarborough. She is in jail and its some wild conspiracy involving everyone but the Pope so on so on.....but listen to this part:

"On March 20, while imprisoned in Navarro County jail on false allegations (isnt that commenting on his case?), Tamara's letter from the Ellis County jail reached me. Rules are that inmates cannot send and receive mail from other inmates. Divine intervention told me that the letter was an exception (for those that still dont know, when he says Divine he means himself).
On March 22, I was released from Navarro and transported to Ellis County's jail. A jailer came up to me, randomly, and told me, "Tamara Yarbrough is here".
I thought, "how does this jailer know to suddenly speak about Tamara, and secondly, how does she know me? Turns out the jailer has been a longtime fan of the ECO. I responded, still shocked that she knew to tell me about Tamara, "tell her that I am here, and that I am going to help her".

The jailer came back and told me Tamara had broke down and cried at hearing and I was in the jail. (typing this story brings tears to my eyes) Joey said that part

I was released several hours later and subsequently mailed her a letter with interview questions. Her response centered on this probation revocation.

Ellis county politicians have covered up for the worst sex scandals. Public officials escape prosecution. The ECO has been the only outlet to post, print and publish what really goes on in this county, and other areas as well. Tamara's case is one of the many cases that I've taken.

Critics didn't think I would get out of jail. A 40 year old behavioral specialist for New York child welfare agencies was reading my Amber Hagerman case updates and, after seeing that I was arrested last year, contacted my parents.

After a bond reduction, this self described "fan of the Amber stories you were doing" wired $5,000 to my parents to bail me out of jail. I'm convinced that divine timing was done to help Tamara, as well as get this newspaper out to the public."


Ok, so does New York know that they have a child welfare worker who willingly bailed out an accused child sex rapist? She, along with Joey's parents should have their necks exposed at this point as they are directly responsible for the slander and pain he is currently causing others by his "newspapers".

43 comments:

  1. Hi, my name is Gingerwimp. I am too scared to say who I am. I will make fun of Joey all day long, and never identify myself. I like to make fun of people and accuse others of all types of things, while I sit protected behind my screen.

    Joey at least was man enough to identify himself when he made accusations. This is childish tactics by weaklings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well you sure as hell make one compelling case about how only wimpy cowards make attacks and call people names online while hiding behind the computer. Now Mr. Wimpy, is that your first name or last name?

    So lets see you are both stupid and hypocritical, and a Joey defender to boot. What are the odds?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Let me see if I get this right. If you hide behind a psuedonom you are a coward and we can question your motivation intentions knowledge Intelligence .... Right?

    ReplyDelete
  4. thats the claim "Wimpy" is trying to make

    ReplyDelete
  5. My name is George Hopgood.
    I live in Waxahachie on Ellis street.

    I don't run a blog bashing somebody YOU DO. You are weak and a coward. You hide in the shadows bashing people. I happened to like the ECO. Don't know Joey in person or anybody he is affiliated with. Just was searching what happened to his site. This is the wimpiest, weakest, and most pathetic thing I've ever seen. A bunch of people bashing Joey anonymously online who won't even reveal their name.

    I've revealed mine. Come by for a visit if you don't believe me. This is such cowardice words can't explain.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here is the thing, I dont care who you are, or who you say you are. Thats not important, just like its not important who I am. Its what you say. You don't have to come on here and read what I write. You can just wait patiently for your beloved ECO to be restored online. This is a blog, nothing more. I'm not trying to play newpaper man like Joey. I'm not even making the news, I am just commenting on what Joey has said or printed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. But it's very weak and cowardly to anonymously bash a person. Despite what you say he has done be it true or not. Even the nature of the blog calling him a little kid. It's just childish attacks on him. I would think that people who would attack him for being a "little kid", would not result to such childish tactics.

    Anyway, I'm done.
    Have a good life.
    God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thats a great little broad brush approach. Be specific, take something I have said specificlly and point out how its incorrect or not.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's not about what you say (be it truthful or not), even if its in negative context. It's the parts where its speaks of innocent families being accused of being you.

    The thing I don't understand is why all of this is anonymous?
    Why go after the man's life so badly and not even stake a claim to who you are?

    It just seems cowardly. I'm not accusing you of speaking the truth or not. If you stand on truthful grounds as you say you do, then there is no need to be so secretive as other people become your whipping boy.

    If it is true he is going after an innocent people/family thinking it is you, and you knowingly allow it to happen on account of your own words (and because of your words), then you are allowing it to happen. If it is true- sure he is the initiator, but you are watching it happen and letting it go. You could end the persecution of people simply by standing your ground and letting Joey know who you are.

    I'm sorry if it offends you, but I seriously just can't get a grip on why somebody would post so much negative information on somebody and retorting to "haha can't find me" tactics. I just find it immature. I'm sorry again if it offends. Just my opinion on the matter.

    Perhaps you have a good reason, I don't know. But seriously, after looking through so much stuff about the entire situation, its way more involved than I want to get into (or have time for) LOL. I'm just stating you should consider letting him know who you are in order to resolve things as adults.

    ReplyDelete
  10. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 22, 2012 at 7:36 AM

    @ Wimpy/Gingerwimp/Mr. Hopgood: I appreciate your comments and respect your opinion. I understand your point of view, but I disagree. There are 2 things I've tried to understand with regard to Joey's supporters, maybe you can help.

    One is: why is it so important to anybody's life to know the name of anybody that posts comments here? In the sceme of things, all of this is just so not important, except to the people whose lifes have been adversely effected by Joey. When Joey prints information that is not verified or verifiable and goes "after an innocent people/family", that's all on Joey - HE owns it, HE alone is responsible for his actions and behavior. HE is not taking on the responsibiliy he should as a
    "journalist", an adult and productive member of society - hence the name "joeyisalittlekid. Joey's pursuit of innocent people, dragging their names through the mud for absolutely no reason other than the sake of making a name for himself, is why some of us are here.

    Two is: Why are Joey's supporters so angry? Before you accuse me of generalizing, go back and look at all comments, including your own. Most, if not all, of Joey's supporters respond with anger and resort to name calling when they run out of viable points to debate.

    It's interesting to me that most of the people adversley effected by Joey are not angry. They tend to see Joey for what he is and he's no more irritating to them than a pimple on their behinds. Bill Fry is a good example. Have you seen what Joey has printed about that man? Joey flat out called him a killer, but Mr. Fry seems to be ignoring the matter. And, Gingersnap had nothing to do with it, couldn't prevent it, can't protect him - it's all on Joey.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I dont get offended on here. And yes its way more than you have time to bring yourself up to speed on.
    I am doing something about it, thats why I spent an entire post on who Joey is slandering and pointing out that its not me and that he is slandering them.

    I'm not going after the mans lifes, at all. I'm not the one that filed the charges, hell I havent even said if he is guilty of innocent of the charges in Navarro. I even defend him when I think he is right such as saying he should be allowed to see his nieces and nephews. When Joey does or says something, people come here to watch as I put what he said or did in a real word context. Lately he has flown off the deep end so just about everything he does will usually be mocked on here, but if he were to do or say something good I would be the first to point that out here as well. This blog is extreamly balanced, although first glance it may not appear that way.

    ReplyDelete
  12. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 22, 2012 at 8:11 AM

    Moving on.....I'm lost - how did Joey help Tamara?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Damn you....you know someday you are going to just take my word for it that its a long convoluted and stupid story.

    But since you asked:

    So Tamara is your typical sweet innocent girl, who happened to test positive for cocaine. She got a protective order against her "physically and sexually abusive husband" Kenneth. Her probation was revoked after that order. Kenneth, acording to Joey, was caught in bed with the next door neighboor's 14 year old daughter. Kenneth's son was sent to Texas youth commision prision for molsesting Tamara's son (I guess they had seperate kids). Tamara also alleged that Kenneth molested her 21 year old daughter. The only kid they had together also alleged that Kenneth molested her.

    Now lets go crazy: Kenneth lives in proximity to a contractor Bernyce Crownover. The IRS told Tamara that Kenneth has no SS number yet he can get a $1 million line of credit at CNB Bank (throw in Mark Singleton's name while we are at it). "This put Tamara in a difficult spot: a born again chrisitan sobering up from a meth addiction while fighting routine child molestation with a husband whose hands were greased by the biggest names in Ellis County politics."

    Oh dear God I cant go on any more, he is going to tie in Alfred Mims, Bill Riley, Ben Boaz, Julie West, Jim Pitts, Joe Barton, Rick Perry, Channel 5, Joe Grubbs and even Texas Ranger Bobo into this before he is done. But to answer your question, he "helped" her by being the only one that would publish her side of the story.

    ReplyDelete
  14. well lets even be more specific, we now know that Joey made this turn from fighting corruption to fighting child sex offenders (he claimed God called him to do it) exactly at the same time he became aware that he was being investigated for the charges he now faces. So its pretty obvious Joey knew he was going down for this so he tried to set up his own conspiracy by saying "I was trying to fight this and now they are putting me in jail for the very thing I fought against"

    ReplyDelete
  15. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 22, 2012 at 10:34 AM

    Sorry I asked. I will believe you next time, calling the story "convoluted and stupid" was an under-statement.

    Thx for the extra effort........

    ReplyDelete
  16. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 22, 2012 at 12:01 PM

    Good news: now we (that are out of the loop and don't care a wit about MVZ, MVZ's issues or MVZ bashing) understand the pedo-clown photo and ballon thief references.

    Bad news: if your statement "people like that have ‘nothing better to do’ than bash others" is in reference to me, you are in the wrong pew.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well for the record her (woman who paid Joey's bails )name is Angelique Kalatzis Stacey, she had a brief job with The Center for Family Support and that's it. She's also falsely claimed her uncle was some federal judge in NYC. She has no relation that is a judge in the USA according to her cousin. Angelique stays at home ans raises her kids (a good thing in my books). Unsure why she or Joey would embellish her background. Either way she's never met Joey, seems to have a few screws loose and deserves whatever Karma God sends her way for letting that monster out. Really, who lets out a child rapist they've never met. Must be one of the creepy conspiracy people who believe what they read online.Baffles the hell out of me. missing and murdered children, kids dying of cancer and she donates to let this freak show continue his bs?

    I don't believe she truly grasps how much pain and harm Joey really brings to innocent people's lives.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I dont get how mzv fits in this either but i too now get the pedo clown thing. umm "nothingbettertodo and ginger are about the only grown ups on this blog. they are respectful polite people and Joey has no business trying to out whoever they are. He only does it to attempt to intimidate and silence anyone who speaks against him.

    I wish people would realllly stop calling him a journalist. He's a little creepy blogger who uses that method to bully and hurt people. a loser. a nothing. He barely passed high school, it took him 6 years to graduate. He would never be able to complete a Masters in Journalism, just a wannabee. Can't wait until he is silenced for a long time to come.

    ReplyDelete
  19. damn ginger, no edit button... meant who lets out a child rapist ... period.

    ReplyDelete
  20. So now u outing people?

    ReplyDelete
  21. And he has actually harmed people or just been stupid? And said stupid things? Who has he harmed. Shane what's his name. He got the kid. The thompsons. Their names came up via subpoena from ginger. Who?

    ReplyDelete
  22. No, the Thopmson's name did not come up in the subpeona, read carefully, Joey said a PI was used to track the IP addresses used in the lawsuit. The PI, or more likely Joey using "people search" is who screwed up.

    And Joey has online slandared literally 1,000's of individuals in his life. No they are not physcially hurt, but their online name is slandared and in this day and age of online background checks thats a big deal.

    ReplyDelete
  23. um no. she isn't hiding her identity at all on all the pages she speaks on fb. she's been very vocal. would it have been better to use her own words and take screenshot? guess i should have. if she didn't want anyone to know who she is, i guess she would have zipped her mouth right?

    hurt? that line is endless who Joeys' hurt. name one really recent legit? donna / amber's mom. joey has actually been very threatening to her.

    many others who are completely innocent of what joey accuses but joey labels them abusers or molesters. and they're not, they've been cleared. how doesn't that hurt someone in their real life? label someone a child molester when they're not can truly destroy lives.

    he's a freak. he's the real child molester and if he had my name he'd probably call me one as well. not because i've ever hurt a child in my life but because i'm so vocal against him. its how he rolls, internet bully

    ReplyDelete
  24. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM

    He's harmed people by being stupid and saying stupid things. He posts names all over the internet saying stuff that's twisted, that didn't happen or was blown way, way out of porpotion based on a conspiracy theroy, born from paranoia inside Joey's head. Once your name is out there, you can't get take it down. Gingersnap is right - taken out of context (meaning, without having some idea of what Joey does), the information Joey posted can be damaging in a background check. Not to mention, it's just plain hurtful when somebody that doesn't know anything about you prints/posts something that is mean and not true.

    Well, sorry, I need to amend that last statement. It's hurtful/harmful when somebody that knows you prints/posts something that is mean and not true. I've seen Joey go both ways.

    ReplyDelete
  25. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 22, 2012 at 3:31 PM

    Please, let me add that I would gladly give you names of people Joey harmed if I felt it would do no further harm to them. As it is, I don't want the names googled so that maybe the posts will be buried deep enough, eventually others won't be able to see what Joey wrote about these people.

    It doesn't matter that the ECO is down, old posts still come up to the top of page 1 when the right information is googled.

    How is that not harmful?

    ReplyDelete
  26. other thing i was doing was setting the record straight because she's not any behavioral specialist in nyc. she is a stay at home mom who worked at a non-profit for about 5 years. big difference between joey's version and the truth isn't it?!

    it goes to show how badly joey twists things

    ReplyDelete
  27. @et al...silence is an indictment according to Joey.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "According to this blog, only fathers have the right to speak…not mothers"
    No, what is clearly becoming my problem is that I allow everyone to have their voice on here and cleary some people cant handle that right. This side show circus crap has to stop. I remember one of my professors in grad school, he was a bad ass Ex-CEO adjunct staff member. He walked in to the class room, introduced himself and then said "now you know how they say there are no dumb questions? Well in my class there are, and dont ask them." Oh that shut the yackers up as I watched their eyes as they tried to process in their own head "what does a dumb question sound like?".

    ReplyDelete
  29. A motion to revoke Joey's bail has been filed for September 18th, 8:15 am at the 40th Dist Court. That is according to Brannon Bridge's Facebook wall.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I wonder why, it could be for a myriad of reasons. And I guess we are talking about his bail for Navarro?

    ReplyDelete
  31. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 23, 2012 at 5:27 AM

    Well, darn it - for Joey. Those rotten, no good, corrupted DA's are so much smarter than he thought.

    40th Dist Court - that's Ellis County, no?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yes it is, its Bob Carroll's court which means its coming from Patrick Wilson. I dont think I ever knew the bond conditions for his Ellis county charges, I thought they just siezed his ECO but maybe they had more to it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Oh the irony of Joey's freedom hanging in the balance in front of Bob Carroll is just to rich. Joey orginally was a big supporter of Carroll until he teamed up with John Margetis who was on a personal vendetta against Bob calling him some of the most vile names you could possibly come up with all on Joey's radio show.

    ReplyDelete
  34. LOL. Thats funny stuff. Motion to Revoke. Must have violated the terms of his release (or committed a new offense ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  35. with Joey, the possiblities are endless. In fact, at this point it would be newsworthy if he actually obeyed the law.

    ReplyDelete
  36. gingersnap, you said everything was going to be deleted and this above is not deleted...i would appreciate if you would be consistent and remove all of it...

    ReplyDelete
  37. and Shane C. your a detective, right? We call you Crusty the clown..Yea..A real detective would tell you this at time of payment Correct??

    ReplyDelete
  38. Ever wonder what we think of you on the reservation?? You know you gained monies from having an Indian bloodline. You know me, Shane Crowe Hey Crusty, where is NO SHOW FARRIS?? Cashing your check???

    ReplyDelete
  39. Lets see WHERE this reply goes?? Shane Crowe or directed under???Ever wonder what we think of you on the reservation?? You know you gained monies from having an Indian bloodline. You know me, Shane Crowe Hey Crusty, where is NO SHOW FARRIS?? Cashing your check???

    ReplyDelete
  40. Are you in some way implying that Barbara Farris has checks that can actually be cashed at a real bank?

    ReplyDelete
  41. Interesting read from the past.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Interesting read:
    http://big-news-magazine.blogspot.com/2010/07/waxahachie-sex-crime-ring-big-name.html#comment-form

    ReplyDelete
  43. the most interesting part is the first comment posted to that diatribe. The 21 year old daughter said the whole thing was a lie (she was part of Joey's "proof" of his claims) and that her mother lies all the time. That story is a classic example of why I have this site and why its named what it is. Joey is just a third rate gossiper cloaking himself as a "journalist". Nothing in that whole story was factually researched or supported in the article. Throw out some crazy allegations, when those dont pan out lets just go supernatural.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.