Monday, August 13, 2012

Curtis Butler Picks Up the Slack for Special Ed Bridge

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGpoxkBc86W4yPirMFzm56Q

 

Brannon took down his youtube channel and now Curtis decides to pick up one of his own.  Curtis was also a member of Joey's former boy band (Joey, Brannon, Curtis, John and Brandy known as the Freedom of the Press Group LLCyaincourt) yes I know Brandy isn't a boy but she doesn't count since Joey said the only reason she was in it was the sleep with the lead singer (ECO manifesto #1).  So anyway, now Curtis has turned the camera on himself and while completely sloshed, he still seems more intelligible than does Brannon in his videos.  There are quite a few videos, they tend over overlap and they are all long but there are some good points covered on topics such as Brandy, Brannon, Amber Hagerman, John Margetis, and Admingate.  I may touch on some of those later.  Curtis disagrees with my categorization of Joey and this accuser as two young boys experimenting.  That's fine, but I still maintain it.

Now we need to hear from Brandy herself, come on BO turn the cam on and give us a youtube tell all, you know you want to.  Joey has done it, Curtis has done it, Special Ed has done it, and they all talk about you now lets hear straight from you.

83 comments:

  1. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 13, 2012 at 10:29 AM

    What's interesting is that the video about Gingersnap and this blog has the most views. Is that because this is the only place Curtis posted links or because we are all expecting some huge revelation?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dont know, the actual video started out about this blog but sorta drifted back into a restatement of the other videos.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well like I stated before. I didnt post the link and didnt feel the need to. Dont like the videos I have a simple sugestion. DONT WATCH

    ReplyDelete
  4. Still like the part where I say "Joey trying to out Ginger is like trying to find a unicorn. It aint gonna happen lol

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Waxahachie high school principal that had a fake degree is now out of a job. The Ellis County Observer was the only outlet that reported that story.


    Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Waxahachie High School Principal Has Fake Degree": http://www.wisdblog.com

    I'm happy that the "fake degree" principal has been replaced. If you do not have a degree, then you should not be teaching or be in an administrative position in a school. This sets a bad example... I do not support anyone who has a fake degree, and their lack of knowledge will eventually catch up with them.

    My husband and I are both degreed professionals and business owners, and I have a terminal degree. I expect the same for my children, so there is no place in our lives with anyone who condones fake degrees.



    Posted by Anonymous to http://www.WISDBlog.com | Exposing Waxahachie ISD at August 14, 2012 6:05 AM

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Joey, yeah its truly seismic the scope and reach of the once ooooo so powerful ECO.

    BTW, when is Presley coming back and you have any new ideas on who I am again?

    ReplyDelete
  7. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 14, 2012 at 4:58 AM

    For the record, I like that part too. It's interesting that Joey cares so much about Ginger's identity and appears to be losing sleep over the matter.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Its driving him bonkers right now because not only can he not figure out who I am, its becoming increasingly clear to him that he cant find the button to push on me. When he thought I was a process server he and John Margetis mocked that profession. This Bev Thompson Joey surrogate when they first started saying I was this Thompson guy they started mocking the air conditioner repair world. He tired to use Loriane and Anthony in their lawsuit agaisnt MVZ to try and get my identity. That didn't work either. Now he is using his slumber party partner Presley to go after me by trying to file agaisnt Shane saying that he sent me and told me what to post against her on here.

    The part that I like the best though now is that while the two court systems have his personal freedom in the balance, at this point I and this blog control the internet name of Joey Dauben. This site is the only thing covering him at this point and this is where everyone comes to get their Joey news, not only that but this site is sneaking up the google search engine to become the first page of anything related to Joey Dauben. I think its hilarious that he spent his whole life trying to set up a name for himself online, and now I own it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 14, 2012 at 5:47 AM

    Sorry, I would have read the new post - but I didn't get past the photos of the swastika and calling the WPD tyrants. Are you people so young that you don't understand the symbol and what the Nazi party was/did? Or, are you just that ignorant?

    I would have used the word "uneducated" instead of "ignorant", but I know the schools are still teaching about WWII in history class - there's absolutely no excuse for this behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love the pic of special ed at the protest http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--VX4s1_5SPI/TtEgaytqDfI/AAAAAAAAAQc/cvgkalvRSl4/s1600/Pic-WaxahachieProtest8_Hwy77.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  11. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 14, 2012 at 6:33 AM

    @ Ginger: LOL - I noticed this blog comes to the top on Google search and the irony is hilarious. The harder Joey tries to out you, the more uninterested in your identity I become and the more I hope you stay unidentified.

    Re: Brannon's protest pic - I think he's the ONLY one of that group with a sense of humor. I would have taken more notice of it if the Nazi photo hadn't pissed me off.

    As I have no intention of going back to that blog, please tell me if there is any indication the Principle was "replaced" because of a fake degree or was it thru normal attrition? As this issue appears to go back several years, it doesn't seem likely that the Principle was "replaced" for that reason. Just interested to know if Joey is again taking credit for something in which he had ZERO affect.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That's hilarious Ginger! You hit the nail, he needs a button to push to gain control. Poor Joey. He's facing eons behind bars but he's worried about 1 little ole blog? Shows how bad off he is mentally speaking.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Curtis if you're going to fake dying and cancer and heart attacks to get attention, then drop the booze and smokes. I did believe you were very ill, not anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Seems there is more than one person claiming cancer as an excuse to lay low. Barbara Farris is looking pretty healthy these days for someone who is terminal. Masks and secret identities abound in this group including crying rape to get even with someone you voluntarily slept with for months, and claiming epilepsy is the cause of your total insanity and absolute vicious lying nature. Or calling oneself a Christian while acting more like Satan, doing harm to anyone you come in contact with no matter how many lies it takes. I had a little respect for Curtis until I saw his videos. Just a trailer trash kinda guy isn't he? Notice the trash stacked up behind him and his nice slurred speech bragging about where he got his plastic lion cup? Real classy! Same goes for Brannon, drunken kid with no real value spouting off as if anyone is supposed to listen. Truly pathetic....

    ReplyDelete
  15. 'No One' ... you are such a Debbie Downer...go back under ur rock if u don't like the fun.

    ReplyDelete
  16. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xio6kZFkmGc

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yeah we dont know because we dont have an actual story as to why this principal was fired but its probably not because of what Joey ran since this happened well after he ran his story.

    ReplyDelete
  18. WTG Brannon! There's starving children, children dying of cancer, old people who are dying alone, name your vice but you choose to protest Joey wearing a mask. How many times did your mama drop you on your head? I can't believe I'm still following this insanity, it has definitely lowered my IQ.

    I protest Brannon protesting with a poster.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I didn't mean for Brannon to protest dying children, I meant he could be doing something truly productive with his life. I hope they lock Joey away for a long time. These people need a life

    ReplyDelete
  20. Gingersnap, I have some info about Joey you've gotta hear. You probably don't know me, but just email me anonymously from some fake yahoo account or whatever and I'll fill you in on it. yeshuaisiam10@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. is this the MVZ manifesto?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Keep up Curtis, MVZ posted pics of herself here before. This Debbie Downer video must be some other wack job. Too bad MVZ doesn't understand that she is the laughing stock of the North Texas. She has alienated everyone including a husband, neighbors, family, friends, boyfriends, a hoard of attorneys & judges, the media, the entire Occupy Movement, Anonymous, and of course, Joey himself! She can't even "play nice" with criminals! If we are all lucky, she won't pull a James Holmes before she gets locked up in the looney bin again, making us all safe! We can only hope...

    ReplyDelete
  23. "She has alienated everyone including a husband, neighbors, family, friends, boyfriends, a hoard of attorneys & judges, the media, the entire Occupy Movement, Anonymous, and of course, Joey himself! She can’t even “play nice” with criminals!"

    luv how u lump 'em all as "criminals." Dat wuz a goooood 1. u r learning 2 be happy now...so proud u turned that frown upside down. ;DDDDDDD

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oh and insanity is much more fun than being a Pisces...he.he.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 11:52 AM

    "He tired to use Loriane and Anthony in their lawsuit agaisnt MVZ to try and get my identity.", etc., etc. (I'm keeping Ginger's hilarious spelling mistakes intact just for laughs)...

    Delusions of grandeur: A delusion (common in paranoia) that you are much greater and more powerful and influential than you really are.

    Ginger, you have yet again been caught out to be a liar. Your thought processes appear to be going down the same "unusual" path as MVZ. Case in point: Seems like you are relying on a barely coherent and rambling comment most likely made by MVZ herself: http://www.topix.com/forum/county/collin-tx/T13FEONFG0UFLOS4A

    Let's see if you are going to moderate me for a second...third...heck, I've lost count of how many times that you have not let my comments through. Par for the course in Ginger and MVZ's world.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No actually you are a liar on two fronts here, you and Anthony subpoenaed me for records for you stupid lawsuit against MVZ, and second I have never moderated you or anyone else on this blog ever. Sometimes if you post a bunch of links wordpress sends it to automatic moderation but I approve it when I can

    ReplyDelete
  27. Oh, and let me go ahead and quote directly fromt Joey's manifesto on this:

    "the subpoened records revealed their identiies when blog companies turned over the Ip address. A private investigator then tracked back sources of malicious content to the individuals named in Haake and Lingle's lawusit. Haake revealed these in several phone intervies with the paper."

    Boom, there it is point blank, yes you are a liar which is why you are playing for and on team joey.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 12:19 PM

    Have you ever thought to consider that your blog contains libelous MVZ comments? Obviously not - that fact would not feed you and MVZ's fantasies. Might burst that imaginary bubble of yours. It is so funny that you thought it was about YOU. Let's all blindly believe everything that you say...after all, you have proven to be soooooo truthful, LMAO!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 12:24 PM

    Oh, so now you BELIEVE Joey's stories? Make up your mind - you cannot have it both ways....er, or when it's convenient to do so.

    Boom, THERE IT IS.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I never said the lawsuit was about me, or that there were comments on my blog from MVZ related to the lawsuit. What I did say was that Joey tried to use the information you got by way of that lawsuit to try and "out" me in his "newspaper". That is 100% accurate in everyway and you know it.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 12:40 PM

    My goodness, you are sounding more and more like your mentor. In that special place where you dwell, please explain how obtaining MVZ's comments on your blog relates to you being "outed"??? Your sense of importance is astounding, BTW.

    It might also be "blogworthy" to note that the parameters of the subpoena dealt specifically with MVZ. Apparently you forget to mention that to your readers. Rest assured, Oh Great One, I am here to set the record straight....until I am moderated, that is.

    ReplyDelete
  32. here is how is relates, because the IP addressses you got, including mine, were given to Joey as a way of trying to track down me and my identity. Thats directly out of his manifesto, not my head. If he is lying about the entire thing please tell us what really happened.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 12:56 PM

    Just what I have previously said, Ginger. It does not relate, except in your and MVZ's universe. Delusions of grandeur, continued:

    "Oh yeah, what I heard is that the lawsuit by Lorraine and Anthony was so that Team Joey Dauben and Brandy Owen and others could find out who was getting the inside information on Joey's cases and leaking it to Ellis County Observer Sucks. So it kinda seems like they were maliciously suing MVZ just to find out who was posting things anonymously and they knew MVZ couldn't afford a big fight since the alleged rapist lawyer and her abusive ex hubby were already suing her and having everyone they could through their connections sue her and harass her for anything under the sun since they are losers like that and since she was being an ethical truthful journalist about them and they don't like the truth being said about them. And she was calling out for help via the internet by telling the truth about what they were doing to her.

    So people with some sense can see that. People without sense or who want to be mean will go on slandering and defaming the real victim - MVZ - in all this. There are mounds and mounds of tapes and evidence to prove it, but no lawyers will help without paying a hefty ransom to go against the system. So, defaults will probably be the typical end game in the courts where only those with money win...not necessarily those with the truth. Anyone who doesn't get that is a moron.

    I mean think about this: anyone who goes to court in front of a jury is risking their fate to 12 people who weren't smart enough to know how to get out of jury duty. Just sayin'"

    Oh. Dear. God. Ginger/MVZ at their finest.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 1:04 PM

    Learn to read and, hopefully, ABSORB: It might also be “blogworthy” to note that the parameters of the subpoena dealt specifically with MVZ. Apparently you forget to mention that to your readers.

    At least get your facts straight before going off on another "it's all about ME!!!" tangent. It's not nice to lie to your faithful readers, now is it?????

    ReplyDelete
  35. ummm thats a cute quote, did I make it? NO, well then next question

    ReplyDelete
  36. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 1:14 PM

    You seem to be squirming, Ginger....with elements of whining. Pathetic little wannabe.

    ReplyDelete
  37. No, the parameters of the orginal lawsuit dealt with MVZ and john does 1-10, one of them being me. And yes I have already stated this on my blog. What I am reffering to now at this point has everything to do with what Joey just published a few weeks ago saying that he used you and the ip addresses obtained in your lawsuit to track down and "out" me. Nothing more, nothing less....now absorb.....maybe change out your tampon, and absorb some more.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM

    Question?? Yeah, riiiiight, Ginger/MVZ. Just the facts:

    1. You failed to disclose the parameters of the subpoena to your readers, specifically MVZ comments ONLY. I'll cut you a break, maybe you are to dense to understand WHAT was being subpoenaed??? In your mind, it was "All About Ginger!"

    2. You admit that you relied on "Joey's manifesto" in order to leap to your self-important "conclusion". Hypocritical does not even start to describe the "wisdom" of this fact source. BS whan it suits you but written in stone when it can be "All About Ginger!".

    3. Shall we discuss the outright lie you told regarding the Amador County court documents that you magically obtained online? Squirmed on that one, too, didn't you?

    4. It appears that you and your mentor, MVZ, are (as I said earlier) becoming thisclose in your thought processes. Guess it's cozy in there for you two.

    ReplyDelete
  39. yes you are dead on, its all about me. I'm the most self absorbed anonymous person ever, its all about anonymous all the time. Everything must be about anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  40. The cat in the hat has returned I see?

    Lorraine, its simple if you would shut your trap. JOEY stated the other day that he USED YOUR INFORMATION (related to the MVZ lawsuit) to TRACK Ginger's identity.

    Do you need me to send you Alphabet cereal and spell it out for you? I cannot understand your disagreement with Ginger. Its plain and simple, you spoke to Joey and provided him information you and Lingle derived from MVZ lawsuit. The IP's.

    Go back to your cat scratch post and file your nails. You're getting a tad grumpy.

    ReplyDelete
  41. I should state 'attempt' to track. Getting IP's is meaningless until you SUE the providing host for the actual identities behind the IP's. A long and costly process only generally done because of criminal (not civil) action.

    You see Ginger, Ms Cat in the Hat thinks she's a smarty cake because she WAS a paralegal long ago. She's also one of the loser mothers who lost custody of their kid. Should explain her personality flaw.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:16 PM

    Ohhhhh, tampon insults! Classy! It was just a matter of time before you degenerated to tampon insults, wasn't it? You learned your MVZ lessons well.

    Please learn how to use spell-check, it's not that difficult...or maybe you should start an "English Language According To Ginger" seminar. Then everyone will know what you are trying to spit out. Everyone in the WORLD will come because it's about "GingerSpeak".

    The parameters of the "original" lawsuit names "Does"; NOT YOU - so now we are right back to "All-Important-Ginger" and the delusions that come along with it. Perhaps Google what a Doe in a suit means. Maybe it will help you get a grip on reality.

    Still wanting to believe (maybe you should get that X-Files "I Want To Believe" poster) Joey's manifesto? With that reasoning, you must therefore believe every single word that he printed. Just to be clear, do you or do you not believe every word of Joey's manifesto?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:18 PM

    Look everyone, it's Yappy riding in to rescue Ginger again!!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:20 PM

    Come on, Yappy, let's see if you can try to deflect some more!!!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:24 PM

    Seems like both Yappy AND Ginger need a copy of that poster. My question is now extended to the Dynamic Duo (Yappy and Ginger): Do you or do you not believe every word of Joey’s manifesto?

    ReplyDelete
  46. LOL you sooo funny. Deflecting what? You gave Joey the IP's so he could attempt his little intimidation games. End of story. Very simple for the rest of us and if you haven't already noticed Ginger can take care of herself very well. She doesn't need my help, I'm simply providing more info about what a lousy ass mother you were. You're almost 60, it takes a VERY SERIOUSLY ill mother to lose their kid many years ago. The courts almost never took kids from their moms. Not prostitutes, druggies or even convicted murderers. You are sumthin special <3

    Oh I'm sorry, I just made this ABOUT YOU! No wonder you respond back. Sue me maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Can't you read honey? Joey is a pile of sh*t who belongs in hell for longer than eternity. Ya think I believe 1 word of his? Go find snort some cat nip.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM

    "Getting IP’s is meaningless until you SUE the providing host for the actual identities behind the IP’s." Awesome. Yappy steps in it and proves my point.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:40 PM

    So you don't believe one word of his EXCEPT for what he said regarding this subject? Tell me, how does THAT make any sense?

    Jumping on the Ginger/MVZ bandwagon must be soooo fun for you all!

    ReplyDelete
  50. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 2:46 PM

    As you said, Ginger can take care of herself and does not need your help - so why are you here??? Deflect, deflect, deflect. Here's another suggestion: it may benefit you to keep your facts straight and updated, but that's merely your ridiculous attempt to change the subject, isn't it???

    ReplyDelete
  51. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 4:00 PM

    Ginger: Do you or do you not believe every word of Joey’s manifesto?

    ReplyDelete
  52. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 4:04 PM

    HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa. Flippin idjit.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 16, 2012 at 9:35 PM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97r8P-Fms24

    ReplyDelete
  54. ... and the chicken says "buck buck buck buck buck".

    ReplyDelete
  55. Sorry forgot to update the facts. Lorraine can now call her child without the State of Cali's permission.

    You love the attention dontcha mama? Me? I'm just here to push buttons. Works doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 17, 2012 at 6:14 AM

    You are obviously looking in the mirror, Yappy....who's the "chicken" that can't even identify themselves? Sounds like you crawled out on the wrong side of your rock this morning; ...tell me, is Ginger/MVZ still imploring you to save her sorry ass? You are still a stupid idiot (see previous posts) and nothing is going to change that. Must be because you are a trick baby that grew up watching your mama conduct business in the back of a car seat, er, I mean your home. Haven't graduated much from there, have you? How's that government cheese, Yappy?

    Let's see..."I don't believe one word that Joey puts forth EXCEPT for what he said about Lorraine." Bawahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!! That's Ginger's rationale, too. The insane world according to Ginger/Yappy/MVZ.

    You like to push buttons, um, deflect? Try the button on your trailer's toilet; it may not work since it's so full of your crap already - but then you are used to living in and around excrement anyway.

    At least Ginger has enough going on to weakly attempt to wiggle out of the hole that she dug for herself by again using you - but you are too addled to realize that, aren't you?

    My question to Ginger still stands: Do you or do you not believe every word of Joey’s manifesto?

    Surgeon General’s Warning: The proceeding comments have been brought to you by an insane woman. Prolonged exposure to said comments have been known to cause diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, gas, night terrors, confusion, wild mood swings, and chronic paranoia. If you begin to experience any of these symptoms, please turn off your computer and call your doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Swiss is my favorite, thanks for asking. I sure do get under your skin hey? hoo hoo. Read my posts, do I look like a person that gets remotely intimidated by scum like you or Joeys clan? "I'll take "WHAT IS NOT ON YOUR LIFE" for a $1000 Alex".

    The people he attracted to his world simply amaze me. I never thought there was this level of crazy out there.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 17, 2012 at 9:01 AM

    It's the other way around, isn't it? Still can't get your good buddy, Ginger, to answer the question, can you?

    I've read some of your posts and your blatant insanity and stupidity shines through every time...it's getting worse with every new post that you make.

    When they gonna commit you again?

    Surgeon General’s Warning: The proceeding comments have been brought to you by an insane woman. Prolonged exposure to said comments have been known to cause diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, gas, night terrors, confusion, wild mood swings, and chronic paranoia. If you begin to experience any of these symptoms, please turn off your computer and call your doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 17, 2012 at 10:12 AM

    Yep, the guys in the white coats will be coming to take you away again very soon based on the content of your posts. Do you remember your straight-jacket size? Maybe your kid does...or you can borrow his.

    Heredity lunacy. Keepin' it all in the family; how quaint.

    Surgeon General’s Warning: The proceeding comments have been brought to you by an insane woman. Prolonged exposure to said comments have been known to cause diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, gas, night terrors, confusion, wild mood swings, and chronic paranoia. If you begin to experience any of these symptoms, please turn off your computer and call your doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Ok once and only once more because you dont deserve even this, but yes I believe Joey over you. I have never said Joey straight up lies, he doesn’t, he twists the truth into his own understanding but he doesn’t make things up. Furthermore, he couldn’t have made this up because there is no way he could have even known about my IP address unless you told him about it....PERIOD. You, or Anthony, and according to Joey it was you in a phone conversation that told him about it. You on the other hand, have yet to say anything close to resembling the truth. You are clearly a compulsive liar and the more you go menstrual over this the more you prove my point.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 17, 2012 at 11:42 AM

    Once and only once, LMAO, I "don't deserve this" - this coming from the compulsive liar that you are and have been caught out to be. Ginger, you are so frickin cute (and predictable) when you squirm, whine and try to play the "holier than thou" card. So entertaining. Simply adorable.

    Do you not realize that you sound like a two-year old throwing a tantrum?? What's the matter, you dish crap out but you can't take it when you are confronted with the truth? Poor widdle Gingy.

    BTW, the suit (and all the pleadings that go along with it) is public record. Does that make the light bulb (as dim as it apparently is) go off at all?

    So now we have settled it, and it only took you a day to try to slink you way out of it - you BELIEVE what Joey says in his manifesto. Priceless.


    Surgeon General’s Warning: The proceeding comments have been brought to you by an insane woman. Prolonged exposure to said comments have been known to cause diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, gas, night terrors, confusion, wild mood swings, and chronic paranoia. If you begin to experience any of these symptoms, please turn off your computer and call your doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  62. I'm sorry. I found this blog as a result of a WFAA report and an Observer article I read a while back. It gave the background of the Hagerman accusations and Dauben's legal troubles regarding a teenage boy (and older troubles from some "dirty cop" thing). What is this lawsuit you are talking about? And who are you? I didn't see your name in any of the articles?

    ReplyDelete
  63. Welcome to the site. I'm a nobody, I'm annoymous. Joey Duaben has a long history of slandering and harming others through his "journalistc" endavours. This blog is here to follow and to try and bring some balance to the wrongs Joey has done. The lawsuit is against a former poster on this blog, but since the comments were posted on my blog I was part of the subpeona in terms of turning over my IP and the poster in question's IP address.

    ReplyDelete
  64. here at this blog we dont care who you are or what you do for a living, its what you say and the value in it that matters here. Where as Joey is desperate to find out who someone is, if they have a high position they are part of a conspiracy by the elite, if they have a blue collar job he will write them off as just someone with a remedial job and therefore the opinions are not important.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM

    The Surgeon General's Warning is such a nice touch!! Just adorable!!!!

    ...and now we all know how Ginger manipulates blog posts to suit her delusional agenda.

    Surgeon General’s Warning: The proceeding comments have been brought to you by an insane woman. Prolonged exposure to said comments have been known to cause diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, gas, night terrors, confusion, wild mood swings, and chronic paranoia. If you begin to experience any of these symptoms, please turn off your computer and call your doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM

    ...and you know what they say about opinions.

    (Insert Surgeon General's Warning)

    ReplyDelete
  67. Thank you Gingersnapthorn of truth. So is "What is Truth" right or wrong? I don't understand how a lawsuit is a matter of opinion. I actually meant my question for Lorraine herself. It seems like she has been grilling everybody else. I just didn't (still don't) understand the relation. I thought I asked a simple and straight forward question.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Its not really relevant which is why I'm tired of it and Loriane. The only reason I even addressed it was because Joey devoted a section in his manifesto in which he "outs" me as some guy in Ennis based on the information he recieved from Loraine reguarding the lawsuit that she has against a former poster on here. I dont care who Joey thinks I am or am not but I thought it would be important to address that he is wrong about this person before he goes and starts to harrass someone who has nothing to do with anything.

    ReplyDelete
  69. and yes "what is truth" is right, Loraine has been a supporter of Dauben and still is according to Joey.

    ReplyDelete
  70. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM

    "Loraine has been a supporter of Dauben and still is according to Joey." Well, that explains a lot.

    Is it just me, or does anybody else notice that most of Joey's supporters are very angry, bitter people?

    ReplyDelete
  71. Presley, Loraine, Tries, that drive by shooting lady, John Margetis all extreamly angy and bitter people. Special Ed isn't angry and bitter, he is just well... special.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 18, 2012 at 5:54 PM

    Does anybody else notice how the regulars here can only make generalized, vague, and above all -subjective statements?

    Hope that you all learned something valuable after being led down the proverbial rosy path.

    After all, it's rewarding to see Ginger at least starting to get back on track with her "according to Joey" disclaimer.

    ReplyDelete
  73. 3. Shall we discuss the outright lie you told regarding the Amador County court documents that you magically obtained online? Squirmed on that one, too, didn’t you?

    Prresley was told by Ginger in an email that Shane Crowe supplies him with the Amador County material. whats the big secret There? its also in the new palmer post. ginger lied that he told that to presley crowe but its in print. idiots iswear

    ReplyDelete
  74. then how come you get so angry when someone mentions that he owns and publishes Newspapers? lol im not the biggest fan of his by ANY MEANS but o gee wow that must explain the "Attempts to put publisher in jail" page right?

    ReplyDelete
  75. I never told Presley that in any communication. I know she wishes I did as she is desperatly trying to find something that would violate her RO against Shane, but she simply doesn't have that to go with because it didn't happen.

    ReplyDelete
  76. It seems like everyone is scared of you Ms. Schaffer-Haake. Do you make it a regular habit of harassing people to the point of intimidation? You seem to have money to spare and enough anger/bitterness to go around the world 5 times. Are you proud of being a vengeful person who appears to cyberbully anyone who crosses you or differs with you? In addition to 'cyberbullying' are you also someone who is hell-bent on seeking revenge against innocent people? You know to fight evil, one really must not use evil to do it...the ends do not justify the means. Hate will not eradicate hate. I hope you find peace and real love in your life. I hope you find Jesus and learn to love others, not hurt them in the process of seeking 'justice.' There comes a point when seeking 'justice' becomes 'revenge.' And that is not right. You are trying to fight against that by your involvement in "Lawless in America" yet are you not doing the same thing you are trying to fight? Life is a process of learning these things. I realize that money can prevent people from learning these things b/c it gives them a sense of power that is really just an illusion. Anyway, I hope the best for you and that the pain caused by the past can be healed through real love.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Lsh and yappy back and forth makes me want to tear my eyeballs out of my head. Bitch bitch bitch blah blah blah. . I support moderation. Moderate these two retarded bitches

    ReplyDelete
  78. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 19, 2012 at 7:34 AM

    "Peace" aka Megan: I hope that your personal circumstances improve.The best of luck to you.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Funny your assumption that I'm a female. If you're ripping out your eyeballs, here's a thought.


    Stop reading the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  80. nothingbettertodotodayAugust 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM

    @ Peace: good job. But, I take exception to your first sentence - I don't think anybody is scared of Lorraine. I'm amused by Yappy's come backs, but the rest of us have simply chosen to ignore her because we want to and we can.

    ReplyDelete
  81. ah, hell...I was hoping a new method might work.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Lorraine Schaffer-HaakeAugust 19, 2012 at 9:16 PM

    It is impossible to miss the irony of Ginger's response to barbacus' comment.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.