Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Brandy Responds

Over at her new site, Brandy Owen responded to the charges raised by Joey in the Dallas Voice article.

http://elliscountytimes.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/joey-dauben-lawyers-lies-and-pure-confusion/

There Brandy, free plug.

Anyway, the article is of BrandySpeak, that being it makes perfect sense to her but we tend to have no clue what she is talking about, so I will attempt to paraphrase it:

In response to Joey's claim that she took down the website without his permission, she claims nuh uh, I just didn't renew the yearly fee.

On the suicide watch story, she says she needed verficiation and said that in the article, (I cant remember it) and that she also mentioned that she knew Joey would never committ suicide. (ok but you said that with the inferrence being that they were setting him up for something that would look like a suicide).

She claims that her saying anything about admitting that he sexually assulted that boy is untrue. I can back her up on this to a degree, I think the part someone is feeding to Joey had to do with a post or a comment she said about the possiblity of "if" he did it, not that he in fact did it. But clearly from this we can see that someone is feeding Joey information and twisting it so that Brandy is in a negative light.

Then she goes on to explain the passwordgate. She changed some, some were stolen, some were taken by the DA's office and she shut out Brannon because he was trying to be a CUNTinuious source of inspiration to Joey on the ECO. Brannon and Brandy were going to go in together and try and restore the ECO when they find out that everything was changed and that the DA had seized it. Wouldn't there be some kind of court order somewhere to back that up?

3 comments:

  1. I'm very doubtful that the D.A.'s office seized the ECO. First, it would serve no real purpose to "seize" a virtual entity. They might seize the code/information/data contained therein but it would require a court order (most likely a search warrant). But to seize and put it out of business would require another type of court order and would require a hearing. I read what Brandy wrote and much of it is perfectly logical but the seizing of ECO by the D.A. makes no sense at all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://elliscountytimes.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/joey-dauben-how-many-posts-can-i-title-pure-confusion/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Http://statueofduplicity.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.